|
|
Witnesses not to be excluded from giving evidence by incapacity from crime or interest.
Saving of 7 Will. 4. & 1 Vict. c. 26.
In courts of equity defendant may be examined on behalf of the plaintiff or any co-defendant, &c.
|
[1.] No person offered as a witness shall hereafter be excluded by reason of incapacity from crime or interest from giving evidence, either in person or by deposition, according to the practice of the court, on the trial of any issue joined, or of any matter or question or on any inquiry arising in any suit, action, or proceeding, civil or criminal, in any court, or before any judge, jury, sheriff, coroner, magistrate, officer, or person having, by law or by consent of parties, authority to hear, receive, and examine evidence; but every person so offered may and shall be admitted to give evidence on oath, or solemn affirmation in those cases wherein affirmation is by law receivable, notwithstanding that such person may or shall have an interest in the matter in question, or in the event of the trial of any issue, matter, question, or inquiry, or of the suit, action, or proceeding in which he is offered as a witness, and notwithstanding that such person offered as a witness may have been previously convicted of any crime or offence: . . . : Provided also, that this Act shall not repeal any provision in the Wills Act, 1837: Provided that in courts of equity any defendant to any cause pending in any such court may be examined as a witness on the behalf of the plaintiff or of any co-defendant in any such cause, saving just exceptions; and that any interest which such defendant so to be examined may have in the matters or any of the matters in question in the cause shall not be deemed a just exception to the testimony of such defendant, but shall only be considered as affection or tending to affect the credit of such defendant as a witness.
|
|
|
In legal proceedings not necessary to state that any jurors had made affirmation.
|
2. Wherever in any legal proceedings whatever legal proceedings may be set out, it shall not be necessary to specify that any particular persons who acted as jurors had made affirmation instead of oath, but it may be stated that they served as jurymen, in the same manner as if no Act had passed for enabling persons to serve as jurymen without oath.
|
